Al Bates: What to name high-density housing

Will Toor made an impassioned plea for higher-density housing in a Sunday op-ed (“Time for Boulder to step up on housing,” Daily Camera, April 2). In particular he wants to override height limitations. He further suggested high-density housing in industrial areas and the 28th-30th corridors.

I agree that we should build some massive structures along 30th. The larger the better. Since it was suggested in the op-ed that such efforts would have a positive impact on the climate, we should be sure to put the word green in the project’s name.

I suggest Cabrini Green.

Source: Al Bates: What to name high-density housing – Boulder Daily Camera

Paul Katz: Make height limit permanent

The height moratorium should be made permanent not just extended 15 months.

I read the guest opinion urging the end to the moratorium for height limits in Boulder and I can’t help but think that the people behind this ill-conceived idea are if successful going to “get in” then “get out with their profits” leaving the permanent residents with a cookie-cutter downtown area that looks like every other small city in America with little or no view of the mountains that makes us special.

I ask the City Council to make the moratorium a permanent restriction and further eliminate the possibility for exceptions. As an attorney I am convinced that exceptions breed other exceptions as people inevitably say “you let him to do it why not me?”

Cut it off. Stop it now. Let the developers find another place to destroy.

Source: Paul Katz: Make height limit permanent – Boulder Daily Camera

Michael C. Deragisch: We should be silent no more on Boulder growth 

I have had the pleasure of meeting and speaking with John Tayer, Dan Powers, and Sue Prant, three of the people who signed the guest opinion “Let building height moratorium lapse” (Daily Camera, March 5). These are all fine people, and I share their view on some transportation issues concerning our fine city of Boulder.

However, concerning the issue of density and building height I could not disagree more. Now is the time to hold firm to the height moratorium, as it is for the Blue line — and we should also hold firm in our commitment to open space. Having lived in Boulder for only 40 years, I still hold tight to the reasons I came to adopt Boulder as my home town — open space, beautiful vistas, and a smaller town feel. If I had wanted to live in a big city I would have moved to Denver.

Source: Michael C. Deragisch: We should be silent no more on Boulder growth – Boulder Daily Camera

Janice Harvey: Stop the ratchet effect of tall buildings

In reading the Sunday edition of the Daily Camera, I was struck by the similarity in the message behind two important issues in the newspaper. One was the ratchet effect, explained by Alexander Lee as successive compromises in dealing with the development of our natural spaces, resulting in the irreversible loss of those precious natural spaces over time. The same ratchet effect is being seen in Boulder with the successive compromises with developers concerning the height limitations imposed on developers in Boulder. Such compromises are leading to the irreversible loss of the views of our iconic foothills and Flatirons, the loss of quality of life, and the walkable and welcoming feel of Boulder. We are experiencing the ratchet effect due to changes in the height limitations since the original charter amendment in 1971, resulting in irreversible changes in Boulder. The City Council took a step toward stopping the progress of successive compromises resulting in the ratchet effect, and reevaluating the kinds of developments allowed, by voting to continue restrictions on building heights in Boulder.

Source: Janice Harvey: Stop the ratchet effect of tall buildings – Boulder Daily Camera

City’s ‘East Edge’ could be due for Boulder Junction-style makeover – Boulder Daily Camera

In January, a panel of visiting urban design and development experts published a report envisioning what the industrial zone around Arapahoe Avenue and 55th Street could look like under very different circumstances. The panelists, working for the Urban Land Institute and commissioned by the Boulder Chamber and the Boulder Area Realtors Association, devised a plan for a new “East Edge” of the city that felt like more of a “special place” than it currently does. Focusing on the 55th Street corridor from Arapahoe to Pearl Parkway, the advisory panel recommended introducing housing in several formats and at varied price levels. …

The panelists recommended exploring buildings above Boulder’s 55-foot height limit, and as high as 90 feet tall, as a way to accommodate extra office space and some of the up to 2,400 dwelling units they considered for the area.

BNA Editor’s Note: Read the full ULI report HERE, courtesy of our friends at BiggerBoulder.com.

Full Story: City’s ‘East Edge’ could be due for Boulder Junction-style makeover – Boulder Daily Camera